#7 compiling on linux with guile 3

Kapalı
tch70 tarafından 4 yıl önce kere açıldı · 3 yorum
tch70 4 yıl önce olarak yorumlandı

The module doesn't compile on linux with guile 3 without modifications, right? I'm attaching my kludge for the problem:

The module doesn't compile on linux with guile 3 without modifications, right? I'm attaching my kludge for the problem:
tch70 4 yıl önce olarak yorumlandı
Poster

What can I upload, then? Here's the patch inline, then (accessible from editing/source view):

--- configure.ac.prev ^2020-05-23 13:23:29.000000000 +0300 +++ configure.ac ^2020-09-24 22:51:46.250648180 +0300 @@ -27,6 +27,14 @@ LIBGCRYPT_LIBDIR="no" LIBGCRYPT_PREFIX="no" . +if test "x$GUILD" = "x"; then

  • GUILD="pkg-config guile-3.0 --variable=guild"
  • if test "x$GUILD" = "x"; then
  • AC_MSG_ERROR(['guild' binary not found; please check your Guile installation.])
  • fi
  • AC_SUBST([GUILD]) +fi + AC_ARG_WITH([libgcrypt-prefix], [AS_HELP_STRING([--with-libgcrypt-prefix=DIR], [search for GNU libgcrypt in DIR])], [case "$withval" in
What can I upload, then? Here's the patch inline, then (accessible from editing/source view): --- configure.ac.prev ^2020-05-23 13:23:29.000000000 +0300 +++ configure.ac ^2020-09-24 22:51:46.250648180 +0300 @@ -27,6 +27,14 @@ LIBGCRYPT_LIBDIR="no" LIBGCRYPT_PREFIX="no" . +if test "x$GUILD" = "x"; then + GUILD="`pkg-config guile-3.0 --variable=guild`" + if test "x$GUILD" = "x"; then + AC_MSG_ERROR(['guild' binary not found; please check your Guile installation.]) + fi + AC_SUBST([GUILD]) +fi + AC_ARG_WITH([libgcrypt-prefix], [AS_HELP_STRING([--with-libgcrypt-prefix=DIR], [search for GNU libgcrypt in DIR])], [case "$withval" in
civodul 2 yıl önce olarak yorumlandı
Katkıcı

Hi @tch70 and apologies for the delay.

Guile-Gcrypt 0.3.x definitely builds with Guile 3.0 so I'm not sure what problem you encountered. Could you check if it still applies and describe the issue itself?

Hi @tch70 and apologies for the delay. Guile-Gcrypt 0.3.x definitely builds with Guile 3.0 so I'm not sure what problem you encountered. Could you check if it still applies and describe the issue itself?
tch70 2 yıl önce olarak yorumlandı
Poster

I don't remember why that AC fragment happened to be needed 2 years ago and more, how this fragment helped. The 2-years old build dir remains and config.log shows there was .nix-profile sitting first in the path. Maybe that was the cause. I don't have that .nix-profile anymore, so can't check.

On my today's system (updated, no nix stuff) both 0.3.0 and 0.4.0 build okay. Let's consider the issue resolved.

I don't remember why that AC fragment happened to be needed 2 years ago and more, how this fragment helped. The 2-years old build dir remains and config.log shows there was .nix-profile sitting first in the path. Maybe that was the cause. I don't have that .nix-profile anymore, so can't check. On my today's system (updated, no nix stuff) both 0.3.0 and 0.4.0 build okay. Let's consider the issue resolved.
Giriş yap bu konuşmaya katılmak için.
Etiket Yok
Kilometre Taşı Yok
Atanan Kişi Yok
2 Katılımcı
Yükleniyor...
İptal
Kaydet
Henüz bir içerik yok.