#9 Flashblock breaks when Chrome:// resources are blocked.

Offen
vor 8 Jahren geöffnet von forko · 3 Kommentare
forko kommentierte vor 8 Jahren

I was pulling my hair out when all of my flashblock buttons disappeared. Disabling extensions one by one I found that NRUL was the problem. I'd like to just whitelist the single URI that flashblock needs but not sure which it is.

I was pulling my hair out when all of my flashblock buttons disappeared. Disabling extensions one by one I found that NRUL was the problem. I'd like to just whitelist the single URI that flashblock needs but not sure which it is.
platform kommentierte vor 8 Jahren
Besitzer

To find out what to whitelist:

  1. In Add-on preferences, toggle Enable Debugging Messages
  2. Restart your session. When you notice the problem,
  3. Open Developer > Browser Console and find error messages from No Resource URI Leak
To find out what to whitelist: 1. In Add-on preferences, toggle `Enable Debugging Messages` 2. Restart your session. When you notice the problem, 3. Open `Developer` > `Browser Console` and find error messages from `No Resource URI Leak`
B00ze64 kommentierte vor 8 Jahren

Can you help with some example? Because all I see is how to whitelist a DOMAIN so that presumably that domain has full access to all Chrome: and Resource: URIs. What we need is a way to make a specific Chrome: or Resource: available to all, instead of a way to make all available to a specific domain. Or am I understanding this all wrong?

Can you help with some example? Because all I see is how to whitelist a DOMAIN so that presumably that domain has full access to all Chrome: and Resource: URIs. What we need is a way to make a specific Chrome: or Resource: available to all, instead of a way to make all available to a specific domain. Or am I understanding this all wrong?
platform kommentierte vor 8 Jahren
Besitzer

Sorry for ambiguity. "Domains" here refer to what follow "chrome://" or "resource://" so if you whitelist "inspector", all resources from chrome://inspector/ or resource://inspector/ are exposed to all content. (Whether this is good is uncertain. Some Mozilla people are trying to separate a minimum set of exposed resources into special domains so that less information is exposed to content when we block other "normal" domains.)

Sorry for ambiguity. "Domains" here refer to what follow "chrome://" or "resource://" so if you whitelist "inspector", all resources from chrome://inspector/ or resource://inspector/ are exposed to all content. (Whether this is good is uncertain. Some Mozilla people are trying to separate a minimum set of exposed resources into special domains so that less information is exposed to content when we block other "normal" domains.)
Anmelden, um an der Diskussion teilzunehmen.
Kein Meilenstein
Niemand zuständig
3 Beteiligte
Laden…
Abbrechen
Speichern
Hier gibt es bis jetzt noch keinen Inhalt.