I like your prompt setting very much, therefore I decided to modify it to my needs.
However, after when I source ~/.bashrc in terminal and have som jobs running either in the background or are stopped, the output of jobs is shown in the terminal, e.g.:
Is there any other way of catching the exit code of jobs without getting is showed in the terminal? Or what is the purpose of this check? Because the exit code of jobs is 0 regardless of having some jobs in background or stopped jobs.
I like your prompt setting very much, therefore I decided to modify it to my needs.
However, after when I source `~/.bashrc` in terminal and have som jobs running either in the background or are stopped, the output of `jobs` is shown in the terminal, e.g.:
```bash
$ source ~/.bashrc
[2]+ Stopped nano
[3]- Running firefox &> /dev/null &
```
The source of the issue is on [line 76](https://notabug.org/demure/dotfiles/src/master/subbash/prompt#L76):
```bash
command jobs 2>/dev/null
```
Is there any other way of catching the exit code of `jobs` without getting is showed in the terminal? Or what is the purpose of this check? Because the exit code of `jobs` is `0` regardless of having some jobs in background or stopped jobs.
As I like to sanitize my code, I was trying to check for the jobs builtin existing, but I was treating it like a non builtin. Thanks for pointing this out, as I almost never suspend -- just background and a lot of tmux. I believe that the issue is now corrected with commit 5a189ed970 and the new type jobs &>/dev/null test which will return a 0 for either commands or builtins if found, and a 1 for failure.
Let me know if this is still on fire for you with the new check.
As I like to sanitize my code, I was trying to check for the `jobs` builtin existing, but I was treating it like a non builtin. Thanks for pointing this out, as I almost never suspend -- just background and a lot of tmux. I believe that the issue is now corrected with commit 5a189ed970 and the new `type jobs &>/dev/null` test which will return a 0 for either commands or builtins if found, and a 1 for failure.
Let me know if this is still on fire for you with the new check.
I like your prompt setting very much, therefore I decided to modify it to my needs.
However, after when I source
~/.bashrc
in terminal and have som jobs running either in the background or are stopped, the output ofjobs
is shown in the terminal, e.g.:The source of the issue is on line 76:
Is there any other way of catching the exit code of
jobs
without getting is showed in the terminal? Or what is the purpose of this check? Because the exit code ofjobs
is0
regardless of having some jobs in background or stopped jobs.As I like to sanitize my code, I was trying to check for the
jobs
builtin existing, but I was treating it like a non builtin. Thanks for pointing this out, as I almost never suspend -- just background and a lot of tmux. I believe that the issue is now corrected with commit 5a189ed970 and the newtype jobs &>/dev/null
test which will return a 0 for either commands or builtins if found, and a 1 for failure.Let me know if this is still on fire for you with the new check.
No, there is no issue anymore. In my case, I just deleted the check as I presume that
bash
shell builtins are always built in.