I feel like I would have an easier time targeting mfws-gs-fe, first. And then returning to fill in whatever features vanilla GS does not offer than pleroma-fe has.
I feel like I would have an easier time targeting mfws-gs-fe, first. And then returning to fill in whatever features vanilla GS does not offer than pleroma-fe has.
https://git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma-fe/wikis/dual-boot-with-qvitter
It looks like doing this requires qvitter. See #7 related to that.
Maybe this could turn into another project idea. Build a front end like the pleroma-fe that does not require specific database bits. sub-pleroma-fe?
I feel like I would have an easier time targeting mfws-gs-fe, first. And then returning to fill in whatever features vanilla GS does not offer than pleroma-fe has.
Added to bounty-hunts.
eb39873b49
I'm not going to do this, but I should return to working on https://notabug.org/vaeringjar/mfws-fe.