#5 consider putting panicparse back

Aberta
aberta %!s(int64=6) %!d(string=hai) anos por themusicgod1 · 0 comentarios

If it was put in it was probably there because it was useful

But this is not a high priority for me at all. The function will probably have to be rewritten to work with the version of panicparse we have

If it was put in it was probably there because it was useful But this is not a high priority for me at all. The function will probably have to be rewritten to work with the version of panicparse we have
Accede para unirte á conversa.
Sen fito
Sen asignado
1 participantes
Cargando...
Cancelar
Gardar
Aínda non existe contido.