Accueil Explorer Aide
Connexion
someonewithpc
/
gnusocial-issues
Suivre 1
Voter 0
Fork 0
Fichiers Tickets 0 Pull Requests 0 Wiki
Branche: master
Branches Tags
gnusocial-is...
/
issues
/
notabug.org
/
126

126 2.1 KB
Lien permanent Historique Raw

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637 
  1. ---
    2. 

  2. title: Bookmarks for Groups
    3. 

  3. author: notabug.org/thndrbvr
    4. 

  4. time: Tue, 05 May 2020 19:04:51 UTC
    5. 

  5. status: open
    6. 

  6. ---
    7. 

  7. 

  8. author: notabug.org
    9. 

  9. time: Tue, 05 May 2020 19:04:51 UTC
    10. 

  10. content: -----
    11. 

  11. Bookmarks for groups that appear in the Group profile in their own section.<br /> Option when adding bookmark to be viewable: * public <br /> * only group members <br /> * only to admin of group<br /> <br /> There should also be a place to add bookmarks when creating a group. Additionally, it'd be useful to have additional "official websites" besides "homepage". i.e. TFC has forums, events, bands, etc. This is different from bookmarks which are more of a go to resource i.e. websites that are reputable sources of information pertinent to the Group
    12. 

  12. -----
    13. 

  13. 

  14. author: notabug.org
    15. 

  15. time: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 22:24:12 UTC
    16. 

  16. content: -----
    17. 

  17. So, you mean expanding the profile of a group, allowing for more personalization?
    18. 

  18. -----
    19. 

  19. 

  20. author: notabug.org
    21. 

  21. time: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 05:12:43 UTC
    22. 

  22. content: -----
    23. 

  23. Not exactly. I was thinking an entire [bookmarks] section, sort of like the directories. The profile could show bookmark tag bundles (or, if no bundles, then tags) maybe? That might be a decent use of space along with galleries -- one of those things we <small>(inc. me -- at least with GIMP or after someone's laid out the groundwork)</small> could come up multiple layout templates to allow focus on what the group considers the most important. The paragraph at the bottom of the OP was about expanding profiles. accidentally replied the following to #125 Adding another layer of complexity would be to allow group admins to optionally pre-define what tags are allowed. And to decide what order everything gets shown rather than solely alphabetical and chronological.
    24. 

  24. -----
    25. 

  25. 

  26. author: notabug.org
    27. 

  27. time: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 15:23:34 UTC
    28. 

  28. content: -----
    29. 

  29. So, the idea is to have collections of tags defined by the group admin (or moderator) so users can easily filter the activities shared inside a group. Correct?
    30. 

  30. -----
    31. 

  31. 

  32. author: notabug.org
    33. 

  33. time: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 16:05:09 UTC
    34. 

  34. content: -----
    35. 

  35. As an option set by group staff only staff defines tags. Yes.
    36. 

  36. -----
    37. 

  37.