12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364 |
- # Cumulative Kconfig recursive issue
- # ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- #
- # Test with:
- #
- # make KBUILD_KCONFIG=Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-02 allnoconfig
- #
- # The recursive limitations with Kconfig has some non intuitive implications on
- # kconfig sematics which are documented here. One known practical implication
- # of the recursive limitation is that drivers cannot negate features from other
- # drivers if they share a common core requirement and use disjoint semantics to
- # annotate those requirements, ie, some drivers use "depends on" while others
- # use "select". For instance it means if a driver A and driver B share the same
- # core requirement, and one uses "select" while the other uses "depends on" to
- # annotate this, all features that driver A selects cannot now be negated by
- # driver B.
- #
- # A perhaps not so obvious implication of this is that, if semantics on these
- # core requirements are not carefully synced, as drivers evolve features
- # they select or depend on end up becoming shared requirements which cannot be
- # negated by other drivers.
- #
- # The example provided in Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-02
- # describes a simple driver core layout of example features a kernel might
- # have. Let's assume we have some CORE functionality, then the kernel has a
- # series of bells and whistles it desires to implement, its not so advanced so
- # it only supports bells at this time: CORE_BELL_A and CORE_BELL_B. If
- # CORE_BELL_A has some advanced feature CORE_BELL_A_ADVANCED which selects
- # CORE_BELL_A then CORE_BELL_A ends up becoming a common BELL feature which
- # other bells in the system cannot negate. The reason for this issue is
- # due to the disjoint use of semantics on expressing each bell's relationship
- # with CORE, one uses "depends on" while the other uses "select". Another
- # more important reason is that kconfig does not check for dependencies listed
- # under 'select' for a symbol, when such symbols are selected kconfig them
- # as mandatory required symbols. For more details on the heavy handed nature
- # of select refer to Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.select-break
- #
- # To fix this the "depends on CORE" must be changed to "select CORE", or the
- # "select CORE" must be changed to "depends on CORE".
- #
- # For an example real world scenario issue refer to the attempt to remove
- # "select FW_LOADER" [0], in the end the simple alternative solution to this
- # problem consisted on matching semantics with newly introduced features.
- #
- # [0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1432241149-8762-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com
- mainmenu "Simple example to demo cumulative kconfig recursive dependency implication"
- config CORE
- tristate
- config CORE_BELL_A
- tristate
- depends on CORE
- config CORE_BELL_A_ADVANCED
- tristate
- select CORE_BELL_A
- config CORE_BELL_B
- tristate
- depends on !CORE_BELL_A
- select CORE
|