introduction.rst 2.5 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152
  1. ============
  2. Introduction
  3. ============
  4. The Linux DRM layer contains code intended to support the needs of
  5. complex graphics devices, usually containing programmable pipelines well
  6. suited to 3D graphics acceleration. Graphics drivers in the kernel may
  7. make use of DRM functions to make tasks like memory management,
  8. interrupt handling and DMA easier, and provide a uniform interface to
  9. applications.
  10. A note on versions: this guide covers features found in the DRM tree,
  11. including the TTM memory manager, output configuration and mode setting,
  12. and the new vblank internals, in addition to all the regular features
  13. found in current kernels.
  14. [Insert diagram of typical DRM stack here]
  15. Style Guidelines
  16. ================
  17. For consistency this documentation uses American English. Abbreviations
  18. are written as all-uppercase, for example: DRM, KMS, IOCTL, CRTC, and so
  19. on. To aid in reading, documentations make full use of the markup
  20. characters kerneldoc provides: @parameter for function parameters,
  21. @member for structure members, &structure to reference structures and
  22. function() for functions. These all get automatically hyperlinked if
  23. kerneldoc for the referenced objects exists. When referencing entries in
  24. function vtables please use ->vfunc(). Note that kerneldoc does not
  25. support referencing struct members directly, so please add a reference
  26. to the vtable struct somewhere in the same paragraph or at least
  27. section.
  28. Except in special situations (to separate locked from unlocked variants)
  29. locking requirements for functions aren't documented in the kerneldoc.
  30. Instead locking should be check at runtime using e.g.
  31. ``WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(...));``. Since it's much easier to ignore
  32. documentation than runtime noise this provides more value. And on top of
  33. that runtime checks do need to be updated when the locking rules change,
  34. increasing the chances that they're correct. Within the documentation
  35. the locking rules should be explained in the relevant structures: Either
  36. in the comment for the lock explaining what it protects, or data fields
  37. need a note about which lock protects them, or both.
  38. Functions which have a non-\ ``void`` return value should have a section
  39. called "Returns" explaining the expected return values in different
  40. cases and their meanings. Currently there's no consensus whether that
  41. section name should be all upper-case or not, and whether it should end
  42. in a colon or not. Go with the file-local style. Other common section
  43. names are "Notes" with information for dangerous or tricky corner cases,
  44. and "FIXME" where the interface could be cleaned up.