123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132 |
- Futex Requeue PI
- ----------------
- Requeueing of tasks from a non-PI futex to a PI futex requires
- special handling in order to ensure the underlying rt_mutex is never
- left without an owner if it has waiters; doing so would break the PI
- boosting logic [see rt-mutex-desgin.txt] For the purposes of
- brevity, this action will be referred to as "requeue_pi" throughout
- this document. Priority inheritance is abbreviated throughout as
- "PI".
- Motivation
- ----------
- Without requeue_pi, the glibc implementation of
- pthread_cond_broadcast() must resort to waking all the tasks waiting
- on a pthread_condvar and letting them try to sort out which task
- gets to run first in classic thundering-herd formation. An ideal
- implementation would wake the highest-priority waiter, and leave the
- rest to the natural wakeup inherent in unlocking the mutex
- associated with the condvar.
- Consider the simplified glibc calls:
- /* caller must lock mutex */
- pthread_cond_wait(cond, mutex)
- {
- lock(cond->__data.__lock);
- unlock(mutex);
- do {
- unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
- futex_wait(cond->__data.__futex);
- lock(cond->__data.__lock);
- } while(...)
- unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
- lock(mutex);
- }
- pthread_cond_broadcast(cond)
- {
- lock(cond->__data.__lock);
- unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
- futex_requeue(cond->data.__futex, cond->mutex);
- }
- Once pthread_cond_broadcast() requeues the tasks, the cond->mutex
- has waiters. Note that pthread_cond_wait() attempts to lock the
- mutex only after it has returned to user space. This will leave the
- underlying rt_mutex with waiters, and no owner, breaking the
- previously mentioned PI-boosting algorithms.
- In order to support PI-aware pthread_condvar's, the kernel needs to
- be able to requeue tasks to PI futexes. This support implies that
- upon a successful futex_wait system call, the caller would return to
- user space already holding the PI futex. The glibc implementation
- would be modified as follows:
- /* caller must lock mutex */
- pthread_cond_wait_pi(cond, mutex)
- {
- lock(cond->__data.__lock);
- unlock(mutex);
- do {
- unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
- futex_wait_requeue_pi(cond->__data.__futex);
- lock(cond->__data.__lock);
- } while(...)
- unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
- /* the kernel acquired the mutex for us */
- }
- pthread_cond_broadcast_pi(cond)
- {
- lock(cond->__data.__lock);
- unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
- futex_requeue_pi(cond->data.__futex, cond->mutex);
- }
- The actual glibc implementation will likely test for PI and make the
- necessary changes inside the existing calls rather than creating new
- calls for the PI cases. Similar changes are needed for
- pthread_cond_timedwait() and pthread_cond_signal().
- Implementation
- --------------
- In order to ensure the rt_mutex has an owner if it has waiters, it
- is necessary for both the requeue code, as well as the waiting code,
- to be able to acquire the rt_mutex before returning to user space.
- The requeue code cannot simply wake the waiter and leave it to
- acquire the rt_mutex as it would open a race window between the
- requeue call returning to user space and the waiter waking and
- starting to run. This is especially true in the uncontended case.
- The solution involves two new rt_mutex helper routines,
- rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() and rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(), which
- allow the requeue code to acquire an uncontended rt_mutex on behalf
- of the waiter and to enqueue the waiter on a contended rt_mutex.
- Two new system calls provide the kernel<->user interface to
- requeue_pi: FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI and FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI.
- FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI is called by the waiter (pthread_cond_wait()
- and pthread_cond_timedwait()) to block on the initial futex and wait
- to be requeued to a PI-aware futex. The implementation is the
- result of a high-speed collision between futex_wait() and
- futex_lock_pi(), with some extra logic to check for the additional
- wake-up scenarios.
- FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI is called by the waker
- (pthread_cond_broadcast() and pthread_cond_signal()) to requeue and
- possibly wake the waiting tasks. Internally, this system call is
- still handled by futex_requeue (by passing requeue_pi=1). Before
- requeueing, futex_requeue() attempts to acquire the requeue target
- PI futex on behalf of the top waiter. If it can, this waiter is
- woken. futex_requeue() then proceeds to requeue the remaining
- nr_wake+nr_requeue tasks to the PI futex, calling
- rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() prior to each requeue to prepare the
- task as a waiter on the underlying rt_mutex. It is possible that
- the lock can be acquired at this stage as well, if so, the next
- waiter is woken to finish the acquisition of the lock.
- FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI accepts nr_wake and nr_requeue as arguments, but
- their sum is all that really matters. futex_requeue() will wake or
- requeue up to nr_wake + nr_requeue tasks. It will wake only as many
- tasks as it can acquire the lock for, which in the majority of cases
- should be 0 as good programming practice dictates that the caller of
- either pthread_cond_broadcast() or pthread_cond_signal() acquire the
- mutex prior to making the call. FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI requires that
- nr_wake=1. nr_requeue should be INT_MAX for broadcast and 0 for
- signal.
|