123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313314315316317318319320321322323324325326327328329330331332333334335336337338339 |
- The seq_file interface
- Copyright 2003 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
- This file is originally from the LWN.net Driver Porting series at
- http://lwn.net/Articles/driver-porting/
- There are numerous ways for a device driver (or other kernel component) to
- provide information to the user or system administrator. One useful
- technique is the creation of virtual files, in debugfs, /proc or elsewhere.
- Virtual files can provide human-readable output that is easy to get at
- without any special utility programs; they can also make life easier for
- script writers. It is not surprising that the use of virtual files has
- grown over the years.
- Creating those files correctly has always been a bit of a challenge,
- however. It is not that hard to make a virtual file which returns a
- string. But life gets trickier if the output is long - anything greater
- than an application is likely to read in a single operation. Handling
- multiple reads (and seeks) requires careful attention to the reader's
- position within the virtual file - that position is, likely as not, in the
- middle of a line of output. The kernel has traditionally had a number of
- implementations that got this wrong.
- The 2.6 kernel contains a set of functions (implemented by Alexander Viro)
- which are designed to make it easy for virtual file creators to get it
- right.
- The seq_file interface is available via <linux/seq_file.h>. There are
- three aspects to seq_file:
- * An iterator interface which lets a virtual file implementation
- step through the objects it is presenting.
- * Some utility functions for formatting objects for output without
- needing to worry about things like output buffers.
- * A set of canned file_operations which implement most operations on
- the virtual file.
- We'll look at the seq_file interface via an extremely simple example: a
- loadable module which creates a file called /proc/sequence. The file, when
- read, simply produces a set of increasing integer values, one per line. The
- sequence will continue until the user loses patience and finds something
- better to do. The file is seekable, in that one can do something like the
- following:
- dd if=/proc/sequence of=out1 count=1
- dd if=/proc/sequence skip=1 of=out2 count=1
- Then concatenate the output files out1 and out2 and get the right
- result. Yes, it is a thoroughly useless module, but the point is to show
- how the mechanism works without getting lost in other details. (Those
- wanting to see the full source for this module can find it at
- http://lwn.net/Articles/22359/).
- Deprecated create_proc_entry
- Note that the above article uses create_proc_entry which was removed in
- kernel 3.10. Current versions require the following update
- - entry = create_proc_entry("sequence", 0, NULL);
- - if (entry)
- - entry->proc_fops = &ct_file_ops;
- + entry = proc_create("sequence", 0, NULL, &ct_file_ops);
- The iterator interface
- Modules implementing a virtual file with seq_file must implement a simple
- iterator object that allows stepping through the data of interest.
- Iterators must be able to move to a specific position - like the file they
- implement - but the interpretation of that position is up to the iterator
- itself. A seq_file implementation that is formatting firewall rules, for
- example, could interpret position N as the Nth rule in the chain.
- Positioning can thus be done in whatever way makes the most sense for the
- generator of the data, which need not be aware of how a position translates
- to an offset in the virtual file. The one obvious exception is that a
- position of zero should indicate the beginning of the file.
- The /proc/sequence iterator just uses the count of the next number it
- will output as its position.
- Four functions must be implemented to make the iterator work. The first,
- called start() takes a position as an argument and returns an iterator
- which will start reading at that position. For our simple sequence example,
- the start() function looks like:
- static void *ct_seq_start(struct seq_file *s, loff_t *pos)
- {
- loff_t *spos = kmalloc(sizeof(loff_t), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (! spos)
- return NULL;
- *spos = *pos;
- return spos;
- }
- The entire data structure for this iterator is a single loff_t value
- holding the current position. There is no upper bound for the sequence
- iterator, but that will not be the case for most other seq_file
- implementations; in most cases the start() function should check for a
- "past end of file" condition and return NULL if need be.
- For more complicated applications, the private field of the seq_file
- structure can be used. There is also a special value which can be returned
- by the start() function called SEQ_START_TOKEN; it can be used if you wish
- to instruct your show() function (described below) to print a header at the
- top of the output. SEQ_START_TOKEN should only be used if the offset is
- zero, however.
- The next function to implement is called, amazingly, next(); its job is to
- move the iterator forward to the next position in the sequence. The
- example module can simply increment the position by one; more useful
- modules will do what is needed to step through some data structure. The
- next() function returns a new iterator, or NULL if the sequence is
- complete. Here's the example version:
- static void *ct_seq_next(struct seq_file *s, void *v, loff_t *pos)
- {
- loff_t *spos = v;
- *pos = ++*spos;
- return spos;
- }
- The stop() function is called when iteration is complete; its job, of
- course, is to clean up. If dynamic memory is allocated for the iterator,
- stop() is the place to free it.
- static void ct_seq_stop(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
- {
- kfree(v);
- }
- Finally, the show() function should format the object currently pointed to
- by the iterator for output. The example module's show() function is:
- static int ct_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
- {
- loff_t *spos = v;
- seq_printf(s, "%lld\n", (long long)*spos);
- return 0;
- }
- If all is well, the show() function should return zero. A negative error
- code in the usual manner indicates that something went wrong; it will be
- passed back to user space. This function can also return SEQ_SKIP, which
- causes the current item to be skipped; if the show() function has already
- generated output before returning SEQ_SKIP, that output will be dropped.
- We will look at seq_printf() in a moment. But first, the definition of the
- seq_file iterator is finished by creating a seq_operations structure with
- the four functions we have just defined:
- static const struct seq_operations ct_seq_ops = {
- .start = ct_seq_start,
- .next = ct_seq_next,
- .stop = ct_seq_stop,
- .show = ct_seq_show
- };
- This structure will be needed to tie our iterator to the /proc file in
- a little bit.
- It's worth noting that the iterator value returned by start() and
- manipulated by the other functions is considered to be completely opaque by
- the seq_file code. It can thus be anything that is useful in stepping
- through the data to be output. Counters can be useful, but it could also be
- a direct pointer into an array or linked list. Anything goes, as long as
- the programmer is aware that things can happen between calls to the
- iterator function. However, the seq_file code (by design) will not sleep
- between the calls to start() and stop(), so holding a lock during that time
- is a reasonable thing to do. The seq_file code will also avoid taking any
- other locks while the iterator is active.
- Formatted output
- The seq_file code manages positioning within the output created by the
- iterator and getting it into the user's buffer. But, for that to work, that
- output must be passed to the seq_file code. Some utility functions have
- been defined which make this task easy.
- Most code will simply use seq_printf(), which works pretty much like
- printk(), but which requires the seq_file pointer as an argument.
- For straight character output, the following functions may be used:
- seq_putc(struct seq_file *m, char c);
- seq_puts(struct seq_file *m, const char *s);
- seq_escape(struct seq_file *m, const char *s, const char *esc);
- The first two output a single character and a string, just like one would
- expect. seq_escape() is like seq_puts(), except that any character in s
- which is in the string esc will be represented in octal form in the output.
- There are also a pair of functions for printing filenames:
- int seq_path(struct seq_file *m, const struct path *path,
- const char *esc);
- int seq_path_root(struct seq_file *m, const struct path *path,
- const struct path *root, const char *esc)
- Here, path indicates the file of interest, and esc is a set of characters
- which should be escaped in the output. A call to seq_path() will output
- the path relative to the current process's filesystem root. If a different
- root is desired, it can be used with seq_path_root(). If it turns out that
- path cannot be reached from root, seq_path_root() returns SEQ_SKIP.
- A function producing complicated output may want to check
- bool seq_has_overflowed(struct seq_file *m);
- and avoid further seq_<output> calls if true is returned.
- A true return from seq_has_overflowed means that the seq_file buffer will
- be discarded and the seq_show function will attempt to allocate a larger
- buffer and retry printing.
- Making it all work
- So far, we have a nice set of functions which can produce output within the
- seq_file system, but we have not yet turned them into a file that a user
- can see. Creating a file within the kernel requires, of course, the
- creation of a set of file_operations which implement the operations on that
- file. The seq_file interface provides a set of canned operations which do
- most of the work. The virtual file author still must implement the open()
- method, however, to hook everything up. The open function is often a single
- line, as in the example module:
- static int ct_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
- {
- return seq_open(file, &ct_seq_ops);
- }
- Here, the call to seq_open() takes the seq_operations structure we created
- before, and gets set up to iterate through the virtual file.
- On a successful open, seq_open() stores the struct seq_file pointer in
- file->private_data. If you have an application where the same iterator can
- be used for more than one file, you can store an arbitrary pointer in the
- private field of the seq_file structure; that value can then be retrieved
- by the iterator functions.
- There is also a wrapper function to seq_open() called seq_open_private(). It
- kmallocs a zero filled block of memory and stores a pointer to it in the
- private field of the seq_file structure, returning 0 on success. The
- block size is specified in a third parameter to the function, e.g.:
- static int ct_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
- {
- return seq_open_private(file, &ct_seq_ops,
- sizeof(struct mystruct));
- }
- There is also a variant function, __seq_open_private(), which is functionally
- identical except that, if successful, it returns the pointer to the allocated
- memory block, allowing further initialisation e.g.:
- static int ct_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
- {
- struct mystruct *p =
- __seq_open_private(file, &ct_seq_ops, sizeof(*p));
- if (!p)
- return -ENOMEM;
- p->foo = bar; /* initialize my stuff */
- ...
- p->baz = true;
- return 0;
- }
- A corresponding close function, seq_release_private() is available which
- frees the memory allocated in the corresponding open.
- The other operations of interest - read(), llseek(), and release() - are
- all implemented by the seq_file code itself. So a virtual file's
- file_operations structure will look like:
- static const struct file_operations ct_file_ops = {
- .owner = THIS_MODULE,
- .open = ct_open,
- .read = seq_read,
- .llseek = seq_lseek,
- .release = seq_release
- };
- There is also a seq_release_private() which passes the contents of the
- seq_file private field to kfree() before releasing the structure.
- The final step is the creation of the /proc file itself. In the example
- code, that is done in the initialization code in the usual way:
- static int ct_init(void)
- {
- struct proc_dir_entry *entry;
- proc_create("sequence", 0, NULL, &ct_file_ops);
- return 0;
- }
- module_init(ct_init);
- And that is pretty much it.
- seq_list
- If your file will be iterating through a linked list, you may find these
- routines useful:
- struct list_head *seq_list_start(struct list_head *head,
- loff_t pos);
- struct list_head *seq_list_start_head(struct list_head *head,
- loff_t pos);
- struct list_head *seq_list_next(void *v, struct list_head *head,
- loff_t *ppos);
- These helpers will interpret pos as a position within the list and iterate
- accordingly. Your start() and next() functions need only invoke the
- seq_list_* helpers with a pointer to the appropriate list_head structure.
- The extra-simple version
- For extremely simple virtual files, there is an even easier interface. A
- module can define only the show() function, which should create all the
- output that the virtual file will contain. The file's open() method then
- calls:
- int single_open(struct file *file,
- int (*show)(struct seq_file *m, void *p),
- void *data);
- When output time comes, the show() function will be called once. The data
- value given to single_open() can be found in the private field of the
- seq_file structure. When using single_open(), the programmer should use
- single_release() instead of seq_release() in the file_operations structure
- to avoid a memory leak.
|