123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175 |
- Background
- ==========
- The upstream Linux kernel maintainers only fix bugs for specific kernel
- versions. Those versions include the current "release candidate" (or -rc)
- kernel, any "stable" kernel versions, and any "long term" kernels.
- Please see https://www.kernel.org/ for a list of supported kernels. Any
- kernel marked with [EOL] is "end of life" and will not have any fixes
- backported to it.
- If you've found a bug on a kernel version that isn't listed on kernel.org,
- contact your Linux distribution or embedded vendor for support.
- Alternatively, you can attempt to run one of the supported stable or -rc
- kernels, and see if you can reproduce the bug on that. It's preferable
- to reproduce the bug on the latest -rc kernel.
- How to report Linux kernel bugs
- ===============================
- Identify the problematic subsystem
- ----------------------------------
- Identifying which part of the Linux kernel might be causing your issue
- increases your chances of getting your bug fixed. Simply posting to the
- generic linux-kernel mailing list (LKML) may cause your bug report to be
- lost in the noise of a mailing list that gets 1000+ emails a day.
- Instead, try to figure out which kernel subsystem is causing the issue,
- and email that subsystem's maintainer and mailing list. If the subsystem
- maintainer doesn't answer, then expand your scope to mailing lists like
- LKML.
- Identify who to notify
- ----------------------
- Once you know the subsystem that is causing the issue, you should send a
- bug report. Some maintainers prefer bugs to be reported via bugzilla
- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org), while others prefer that bugs be reported
- via the subsystem mailing list.
- To find out where to send an emailed bug report, find your subsystem or
- device driver in the MAINTAINERS file. Search in the file for relevant
- entries, and send your bug report to the person(s) listed in the "M:"
- lines, making sure to Cc the mailing list(s) in the "L:" lines. When the
- maintainer replies to you, make sure to 'Reply-all' in order to keep the
- public mailing list(s) in the email thread.
- If you know which driver is causing issues, you can pass one of the driver
- files to the get_maintainer.pl script:
- perl scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f <filename>
- If it is a security bug, please copy the Security Contact listed in the
- MAINTAINERS file. They can help coordinate bugfix and disclosure. See
- Documentation/SecurityBugs for more information.
- If you can't figure out which subsystem caused the issue, you should file
- a bug in kernel.org bugzilla and send email to
- linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, referencing the bugzilla URL. (For more
- information on the linux-kernel mailing list see
- http://www.tux.org/lkml/).
- Tips for reporting bugs
- -----------------------
- If you haven't reported a bug before, please read:
- http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html
- http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
- It's REALLY important to report bugs that seem unrelated as separate email
- threads or separate bugzilla entries. If you report several unrelated
- bugs at once, it's difficult for maintainers to tease apart the relevant
- data.
- Gather information
- ------------------
- The most important information in a bug report is how to reproduce the
- bug. This includes system information, and (most importantly)
- step-by-step instructions for how a user can trigger the bug.
- If the failure includes an "OOPS:", take a picture of the screen, capture
- a netconsole trace, or type the message from your screen into the bug
- report. Please read "Documentation/oops-tracing.txt" before posting your
- bug report. This explains what you should do with the "Oops" information
- to make it useful to the recipient.
- This is a suggested format for a bug report sent via email or bugzilla.
- Having a standardized bug report form makes it easier for you not to
- overlook things, and easier for the developers to find the pieces of
- information they're really interested in. If some information is not
- relevant to your bug, feel free to exclude it.
- First run the ver_linux script included as scripts/ver_linux, which
- reports the version of some important subsystems. Run this script with
- the command "sh scripts/ver_linux".
- Use that information to fill in all fields of the bug report form, and
- post it to the mailing list with a subject of "PROBLEM: <one line
- summary from [1.]>" for easy identification by the developers.
- [1.] One line summary of the problem:
- [2.] Full description of the problem/report:
- [3.] Keywords (i.e., modules, networking, kernel):
- [4.] Kernel information
- [4.1.] Kernel version (from /proc/version):
- [4.2.] Kernel .config file:
- [5.] Most recent kernel version which did not have the bug:
- [6.] Output of Oops.. message (if applicable) with symbolic information
- resolved (see Documentation/oops-tracing.txt)
- [7.] A small shell script or example program which triggers the
- problem (if possible)
- [8.] Environment
- [8.1.] Software (add the output of the ver_linux script here)
- [8.2.] Processor information (from /proc/cpuinfo):
- [8.3.] Module information (from /proc/modules):
- [8.4.] Loaded driver and hardware information (/proc/ioports, /proc/iomem)
- [8.5.] PCI information ('lspci -vvv' as root)
- [8.6.] SCSI information (from /proc/scsi/scsi)
- [8.7.] Other information that might be relevant to the problem
- (please look in /proc and include all information that you
- think to be relevant):
- [X.] Other notes, patches, fixes, workarounds:
- Follow up
- =========
- Expectations for bug reporters
- ------------------------------
- Linux kernel maintainers expect bug reporters to be able to follow up on
- bug reports. That may include running new tests, applying patches,
- recompiling your kernel, and/or re-triggering your bug. The most
- frustrating thing for maintainers is for someone to report a bug, and then
- never follow up on a request to try out a fix.
- That said, it's still useful for a kernel maintainer to know a bug exists
- on a supported kernel, even if you can't follow up with retests. Follow
- up reports, such as replying to the email thread with "I tried the latest
- kernel and I can't reproduce my bug anymore" are also helpful, because
- maintainers have to assume silence means things are still broken.
- Expectations for kernel maintainers
- -----------------------------------
- Linux kernel maintainers are busy, overworked human beings. Some times
- they may not be able to address your bug in a day, a week, or two weeks.
- If they don't answer your email, they may be on vacation, or at a Linux
- conference. Check the conference schedule at LWN.net for more info:
- https://lwn.net/Calendar/
- In general, kernel maintainers take 1 to 5 business days to respond to
- bugs. The majority of kernel maintainers are employed to work on the
- kernel, and they may not work on the weekends. Maintainers are scattered
- around the world, and they may not work in your time zone. Unless you
- have a high priority bug, please wait at least a week after the first bug
- report before sending the maintainer a reminder email.
- The exceptions to this rule are regressions, kernel crashes, security holes,
- or userspace breakage caused by new kernel behavior. Those bugs should be
- addressed by the maintainers ASAP. If you suspect a maintainer is not
- responding to these types of bugs in a timely manner (especially during a
- merge window), escalate the bug to LKML and Linus Torvalds.
- Thank you!
- [Some of this is taken from Frohwalt Egerer's original linux-kernel FAQ]
|