Take a look at other related network projects etc, non-code.
* https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/
* https://bluishcoder.co.nz/2017/10/12/zerome-decentralized-microblogging-on-zeronet.html
* https://zeronet.io/
* https://louis.center/p2p-social-networking/
* https://beakerbrowser.com/
* https://gnunet.org/
* https://github.com/dominictarr/scuttlebutt
regarding the gits-r-us project:
the most complete non-technical overview, user stories, and RFCs are the README of this repo --> https://notabug.org/NotABug.org/notabug-2.0
for a more technical overview and RFCs see the README of this repo --> https://notabug.org/bill-auger/gits-r-us
the august 2016 peers community evaluation of git hosting server software is published at this URL:
https://wiki.freephile.org/wiki/Comparison_of_git_hosting_options
<ORIGINAL_URL_HIDDEN>
<!--
original editable pad
https://ethercalc.org/choose-the-git-host
original read-only HTML
https://ethercalc.org/choose-the-git-host.html
-->
i suppose it would be remiss not to mention now the git-pub spec discussions - the reason i changed the repo name was to avoid confusion with the existing notabug instance while bringing the notabug-2.0 discussions to the attention of the git-pub group
as noted in the 2016 forge evaluations, coding-team is one of the few forges that already has some federation features - it would be good to have them in the discussion - the only others were vervis and pagure, both of which are already represented in the git-pub discussion
BTW, the forge evaluation spreadsheet was picked up by freenode user 'freephile' and is now mirrored in static form on his website
i suppose it would be remiss not to mention now the git-pub spec discussions - the reason i changed the repo name was to avoid confusion with the existing notabug instance while bringing the notabug-2.0 discussions to the attention of the git-pub group
https://framalistes.org/sympa/arc/git-federation
https://github.com/git-federation/gitpub
as noted in the 2016 forge evaluations, coding-team is one of the few forges that already has some federation features - it would be good to have them in the discussion - the only others were vervis and pagure, both of which are already represented in the git-pub discussion
BTW, the forge evaluation spreadsheet was picked up by freenode user 'freephile' and is now mirrored in static form on his website
https://wiki.freephile.org/wiki/Comparison_of_git_hosting_options
Thanks. I mostly just added the updated link in passing while talking to someone in person.
Ah, yes I should have linked Vervis.
https://dev.angeley.es/s/fr33domlover/r/vervis
Record the requirements and give some credit to existing projects such as gits-r-us, git-dit, or GitTorrent.
Take a look at other related network projects etc, non-code.
TMM's threads on freepo.st:
Federated NAB
P2P NAB
NAB 2.0 feature proposals
regarding the gits-r-us project:
the most complete non-technical overview, user stories, and RFCs are the README of this repo --> https://notabug.org/NotABug.org/notabug-2.0
for a more technical overview and RFCs see the README of this repo --> https://notabug.org/bill-auger/gits-r-us
the august 2016 peers community evaluation of git hosting server software is published at this URL:
https://wiki.freephile.org/wiki/Comparison_of_git_hosting_options
<ORIGINAL_URL_HIDDEN>
from clacke:
https://gnusocial.no/conversation/2811123
https://codingteam.net/project/codingteam
https://notabug.org/NotABug.org/notabug-2.0
i suppose it would be remiss not to mention now the git-pub spec discussions - the reason i changed the repo name was to avoid confusion with the existing notabug instance while bringing the notabug-2.0 discussions to the attention of the git-pub group
https://framalistes.org/sympa/arc/git-federation
https://github.com/git-federation/gitpub
as noted in the 2016 forge evaluations, coding-team is one of the few forges that already has some federation features - it would be good to have them in the discussion - the only others were vervis and pagure, both of which are already represented in the git-pub discussion
BTW, the forge evaluation spreadsheet was picked up by freenode user 'freephile' and is now mirrored in static form on his website
https://wiki.freephile.org/wiki/Comparison_of_git_hosting_options
Thanks. I mostly just added the updated link in passing while talking to someone in person.
Ah, yes I should have linked Vervis.
https://dev.angeley.es/s/fr33domlover/r/vervis