Also enrich_msg() was quickly done to get a working version of feeds. It could also be considered effort duplication to update both functions for any changes in the future.
So it's maybe best to adapt markup() to export posts for RSS, example: changing relative links to URLs.
Currently `enrich_msg()` from rss.py is a stripped down and simplified version of `markup()` from microblog.py
https://notabug.org/likho/microblog.py/src/rss_1/src/rss.py#L39
https://notabug.org/likho/microblog.py/src/rss_1/src/microblog.py#L83
Also `enrich_msg()` was quickly done to get a working version of feeds. It could also be considered effort duplication to update both functions for any changes in the future.
So it's maybe best to adapt `markup()` to export posts for RSS, example: changing relative links to URLs.
Currently
enrich_msg()
from rss.py is a stripped down and simplified version ofmarkup()
from microblog.pyhttps://notabug.org/likho/microblog.py/src/rss_1/src/rss.py#L39
https://notabug.org/likho/microblog.py/src/rss_1/src/microblog.py#L83
Also
enrich_msg()
was quickly done to get a working version of feeds. It could also be considered effort duplication to update both functions for any changes in the future.So it's maybe best to adapt
markup()
to export posts for RSS, example: changing relative links to URLs.