lftr.org 4.2 KB
LFTR
It uses 99% of the fuel and only 1% is left. That 1% is Plutonium-238, which NASA is desperate for.
It's how all of NASA's deep space missions operate. Plutonium-238 is worthless for bombs. Plutonium-239 is really good for bombs.
1,000 KG, only 15 kg of plutonium-238 is left over. That's 98.5% of fuel being used. (https://youtu.be/P9M__yYbsZ4?t=4391)
could make Molybdenum-99, which is used for diagnostic procedures.
The U.S. in the only country in the world that has sent space probes beyond the asteroid belt, and it's been based on Plutonium-238. https://youtu.be/P9M__yYbsZ4?t=4414
Bismuth-213 cancer research. Alpha emitting particle. All cancer research is based on beta emitting particles
Canada shut it down in 2015. (check this) https://youtu.be/P9M__yYbsZ4?t=4441
Beta has a big kill radius and is not very direct-able.
Alpha is great for dispersed cancers leukemia, pancreatic.
low pressure operation
bismuth 213 can only be generated from the decay of uranium-233. https://youtu.be/P9M__yYbsZ4?t=4520 Don't need 9 inch thick steel. Huge concrete confinement areas.
don't need to fabricate or enrich fuel.
No disposal approach.
Huge level of safety
https://youtu.be/P9M__yYbsZ4?t=4659 https://youtu.be/P9M__yYbsZ4?t=4666
civilian nuclear power in the U.S. has not killed anyone.
linear no threshold hypothesis
https://youtu.be/P9M__yYbsZ4?t=4676 https://youtu.be/P9M__yYbsZ4?t=5119
Not based on epidemiological data.
It's based on the assumption that radiation will harm you at whatever degree to whatever degree you are exposed.
It is established in policy, but there is no study that confirms this. No study says, we have taken a small portion of people, exposed them to 1% for radiation, and have seen 1% more cancer. In fact, there are many places in the world where background radiation is substantially higher than elsewhere. But those areas have less areas of cancers.
Hormesis a little bit is good for you.
https://youtu.be/P9M__yYbsZ4?t=5133
People aren't really worried about natural radiation. artificial radiation is the same thing.
NORM naturally occurring radioactive materials. Frack a shale and pull gas out, a lot of radon comes out too. You burn the gas that radon is being released.
Coal contains small amounts of thorium and uranium. They get dispersed in the air.
Coal releases more radiation that nuclear power plants do.
radon is the biggest amount of radioactivity
A sunburn is radiation damage. It's radiation burn. It comes out of the ground and we are breathing it right now
burning fuel you get 30% of the energy
https://youtu.be/P9M__yYbsZ4?t=5378 When you put $1 in your car in gas, kill 60 cents goodbye.
10% goes away on transmission lines.
china is going LFTR
he said that LFTR uses fluoride as a fuel
1 kilogram of fissile material produces as much energy as 13,000 barrels of oil.
Thorium-232 (natural thorium) is not a nuclear fuel,
https://youtu.be/P9M__yYbsZ4?t=5489 I thought thorium was the fuel? but if it consumes a neutron, then it'll become TH-233, which has a half life of 20 minutes. WOW! TH-233 decays into Protactinium-233, which in one month will decay into uranium-233 an ideal fuel. Thermal reaction...?
reactors today burn uranium-235, which is like burning platinum.
molten salt reactor
ARE
If you hit uranium-233 with a neutron, it'll fission and release a neutron that'll hit natural thorium to start the whole thing all over. LFTR is a type of molten salt reactor Aircraft reactor experiment a proof of concept molten salt reactor that ran for 100 hours reaching temperatures up to 1150 K ran for 11 days. operated from <1954-11-03 Sun>-<1954-11-12>
Very stable...as salt heated up, less fissile material in the core. So fission became less likely.
As the salt cooled down, there was more fissile material in the core, so fission become more likely.
molten salt reactor experiment
2 fluid MSR design.
This is a dynamically stable system. ran from 1965-1969 Core fluid (lithium bar ilium salt ) with uranium tetra-fluoride in there.
Bruce Hoglund
MSR research