future-bug 1.5 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738
  1. Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2199 21:03:50 -0600
  2. From: Karl Fogel <kfogel@floss.cyclic.com>
  3. To: bug-gnu-emacs@prep.ai.mit.edu
  4. Subject: M-x search-backward-in-time broken...
  5. X-Windows: you'll envy the dead.
  6. In GNU Emacs 51.70.4 (i9986-unknown-linux-gnu, X toolkit) of Sat Feb 20 2199 on floss
  7. configured using `configure --with-x-toolkit=yes'
  8. The `search-backward-in-time' function appears to be broken in
  9. Emacs 51.70.
  10. Unfortunately, I can never seem to start the debugger early
  11. enough to catch the error as it happens. However I have traced the
  12. problem through source by eye, and it looks like `time-forward' can't
  13. handle negative arguments anymore. This is consistent with other
  14. symptoms: for example, `undo' (which since 51.25 has worked by passing
  15. a negative arg to `time-forward') is also broken. However, `do' still
  16. works -- it seems that `time-forward' continues to handle positive
  17. arguments just fine.
  18. No one here-and-now can figure out how to fix the problem,
  19. because the code for `time-forward' is so hairy. We're using M-x
  20. report-future-emacs-bug to request that you folks include more
  21. comments when you write it (sometime in 2198 as I recall).
  22. Thanks!
  23. -Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com>
  24. P.S. You'll be pleased to know that since (time-forward N) still works
  25. for N >= 0, we've used it to pre-emptively update configure.in.
  26. Emacs now configures and builds on every platform that will ever
  27. be made. It wasn't easy, but at least that's one problem out of
  28. the way for good. If you'd like the patch, just ask.