Bookmarks for groups that appear in the Group profile in their own section.
Option when adding bookmark to be viewable:
public
only group members
only to admin of group
There should also be a place to add bookmarks when creating a group. Additionally, it'd be useful to have additional "official websites" besides "homepage". i.e. TFC has forums, events, bands, etc. This is different from bookmarks which are more of a go to resource i.e. websites that are reputable sources of information pertinent to the Group
Bookmarks for groups that appear in the Group profile in their own section.<br />
Option when adding bookmark to be viewable:
* public <br />
* only group members <br />
* only to admin of group<br />
<br />
There should also be a place to add bookmarks when creating a group. Additionally, it'd be useful to have additional "official websites" besides "homepage". i.e. TFC has forums, events, bands, etc. This is different from bookmarks which are more of a go to resource i.e. websites that are reputable sources of information pertinent to the Group
Not exactly. I was thinking an entire [bookmarks] section, sort of like the directories. The profile could show bookmark tag bundles (or, if no bundles, then tags) maybe?
That might be a decent use of space along with galleries -- one of those things we (inc. me -- at least with GIMP or after someone's laid out the groundwork) could come up multiple layout templates to allow focus on what the group considers the most important.
The paragraph at the bottom of the OP was about expanding profiles.
accidentally replied the following to #125
Adding another layer of complexity would be to allow group admins to optionally pre-define what tags are allowed.
And to decide what order everything gets shown rather than solely alphabetical and chronological.
Not exactly. I was thinking an entire [bookmarks] section, sort of like the directories. The profile could show bookmark tag bundles (or, if no bundles, then tags) maybe?
That might be a decent use of space along with galleries -- one of those things we <small>(inc. me -- at least with GIMP or after someone's laid out the groundwork)</small> could come up multiple layout templates to allow focus on what the group considers the most important.
The paragraph at the bottom of the OP was about expanding profiles.
accidentally replied the following to #125
Adding another layer of complexity would be to allow group admins to optionally pre-define what tags are allowed.
And to decide what order everything gets shown rather than solely alphabetical and chronological.
So, the idea is to have collections of tags defined by the group admin (or moderator) so users can easily filter the activities shared inside a group. Correct?
So, the idea is to have collections of tags defined by the group admin (or moderator) so users can easily filter the activities shared inside a group. Correct?
Bookmarks for groups that appear in the Group profile in their own section.
Option when adding bookmark to be viewable:
There should also be a place to add bookmarks when creating a group. Additionally, it'd be useful to have additional "official websites" besides "homepage". i.e. TFC has forums, events, bands, etc. This is different from bookmarks which are more of a go to resource i.e. websites that are reputable sources of information pertinent to the Group
So, you mean expanding the profile of a group, allowing for more personalization?
Not exactly. I was thinking an entire [bookmarks] section, sort of like the directories. The profile could show bookmark tag bundles (or, if no bundles, then tags) maybe? That might be a decent use of space along with galleries -- one of those things we (inc. me -- at least with GIMP or after someone's laid out the groundwork) could come up multiple layout templates to allow focus on what the group considers the most important.
The paragraph at the bottom of the OP was about expanding profiles.
accidentally replied the following to #125 Adding another layer of complexity would be to allow group admins to optionally pre-define what tags are allowed. And to decide what order everything gets shown rather than solely alphabetical and chronological.
So, the idea is to have collections of tags defined by the group admin (or moderator) so users can easily filter the activities shared inside a group. Correct?
As an option set by group staff only staff defines tags. Yes.