123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174 |
- ;;; primitives.scm -- primitive operators for Joy.
- ;;; Copyright © 2016 Eric Bavier <bavier@member.fsf.org>
- ;;;
- ;;; Joy is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under
- ;;; the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
- ;;; Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or (at your
- ;;; option) any later version.
- ;;;
- ;;; Joy is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
- ;;; ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY
- ;;; or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public
- ;;; License for more details.
- ;;;
- ;;; You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
- ;;; along with Joy. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
- ;;; Commentary:
- ;;;
- ;;; All Joy procedures take a stack argument and return a stack
- ;;; argument. It's convenient for primitives to use Scheme "rest"
- ;;; arguments to deconstruct the expected number of arguments.
- (define-module (language joy primitives)
- #:use-module ((system base compile)
- #:select (compiled-file-name compile-file))
- #:use-module ((guile)
- #:select (load-compiled string-append and=>))
- #:use-module ((ice-9 safe-r5rs)
- #:select (+ - < > eqv? display list->string)
- #:renamer (symbol-prefix-proc '%))
- #:use-module ((srfi srfi-1)
- #:select (cons fold every)
- #:renamer (symbol-prefix-proc '%))
- #:use-module (srfi srfi-2)
- #:use-module (language joy write)
- #:replace (cons + - < > =)
- #:export (uncons
- swap
- dup
- pop
- choice
- infra
- stack
- unstack
- ;; IO
- putch
- putchars
- write
- #{.}#
- include
- ;; datatype inquiry
- logical
- char
- integer
- string
- list
- ;; variable definition
- def
- exit))
- ;;; Code:
- (define (->truth b)
- (if b 'true 'false))
- ;;; TODO: This could be written in base in terms of '='.
- (define (logical x . S)
- (%cons (->truth (if (eq? x 'true)
- #t
- (eq? x 'false))) S))
- (define (char x . S)
- (%cons (->truth (char? x)) S))
- (define (integer x . S)
- (%cons (->truth (integer? x)) S))
- (define (string x . S)
- (%cons (->truth (and (list? x) (%every char? x)))
- S))
- (define (list x . S)
- (%cons (->truth (list? x)) S))
- (define (cons lst x . S)
- (%cons (%cons x lst) S))
- (define (uncons lst . S)
- (%cons (cdr lst) (%cons (car lst) S)))
- (define (swap x y . S)
- (%cons y (%cons x S)))
- (define (dup x . S)
- (%cons x (%cons x S)))
- (define (pop _ . S)
- S)
- (define (+ x y . S)
- (%cons (%+ y x) S))
- (define (- x y . S)
- (%cons (%- y x) S))
- (define (< x y . S)
- (%cons (->truth (%< y x)) S))
- (define (> x y . S)
- (%cons (->truth (%> y x)) S))
- (define (= x y . S)
- (%cons (->truth (%eqv? x y)) S))
- (define (choice y x b . S)
- (%cons (if (eq? b 'true) x y) S))
- (define (infra q lst . S)
- (%cons (%fold (@ (language joy eval) eval) lst q)
- S))
- (define (stack . S)
- (%cons S S))
- (define (unstack S . _)
- S)
- (define (putch c . S)
- (write-char c)
- S)
- ;;; TODO: This could be written in base in terms of putch.
- (define (putchars x . S)
- (%display (list->string x))
- S)
- (define (write x . S)
- (write-joy x)
- S)
- (define #{.}# write)
- (define (include str . S)
- (and-let* ((s (list->string str))
- (f (search-path %load-path s '("" ".joy")))
- (go (compiled-file-name f)))
- (if go
- (begin
- (compile-file f #:output-file go #:from 'joy)
- (apply (load-compiled go) S))
- (error "could not find file to include:" s))))
- (define (def body sym . S)
- (module-define! (resolve-module '(joy))
- (car sym) ;item is list-quoted
- body)
- S)
- (define (exit status . _)
- "Immediately exit the program with STATUS."
- (primitive-exit status))
- ;;; For efficiency, having low-level implementations of the following
- ;;; might be beneficial (though I have yet to prove this in practice):
- ;;;
- ;;; i dip dipd popd dupd swapd times divmod / * % <= >= max min true false and
- ;;; or not null branch ifte
- ;;;
- ;;; In particular, it seems the dip and i combinators would be
- ;;; especially beneficial. Or just dip if we use 'i == dup dip pop'.
|