123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188 |
- /*
- * SpanDSP - a series of DSP components for telephony
- *
- * echo.c - A line echo canceller. This code is being developed
- * against and partially complies with G168.
- *
- * Written by Steve Underwood <steveu@coppice.org>
- * and David Rowe <david_at_rowetel_dot_com>
- *
- * Copyright (C) 2001 Steve Underwood and 2007 David Rowe
- *
- * All rights reserved.
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
- * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2, as
- * published by the Free Software Foundation.
- *
- * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
- * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
- * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
- * GNU General Public License for more details.
- *
- * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
- * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
- * Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
- */
- #ifndef __ECHO_H
- #define __ECHO_H
- /*
- Line echo cancellation for voice
- What does it do?
- This module aims to provide G.168-2002 compliant echo cancellation, to remove
- electrical echoes (e.g. from 2-4 wire hybrids) from voice calls.
- How does it work?
- The heart of the echo cancellor is FIR filter. This is adapted to match the
- echo impulse response of the telephone line. It must be long enough to
- adequately cover the duration of that impulse response. The signal transmitted
- to the telephone line is passed through the FIR filter. Once the FIR is
- properly adapted, the resulting output is an estimate of the echo signal
- received from the line. This is subtracted from the received signal. The result
- is an estimate of the signal which originated at the far end of the line, free
- from echos of our own transmitted signal.
- The least mean squares (LMS) algorithm is attributed to Widrow and Hoff, and
- was introduced in 1960. It is the commonest form of filter adaption used in
- things like modem line equalisers and line echo cancellers. There it works very
- well. However, it only works well for signals of constant amplitude. It works
- very poorly for things like speech echo cancellation, where the signal level
- varies widely. This is quite easy to fix. If the signal level is normalised -
- similar to applying AGC - LMS can work as well for a signal of varying
- amplitude as it does for a modem signal. This normalised least mean squares
- (NLMS) algorithm is the commonest one used for speech echo cancellation. Many
- other algorithms exist - e.g. RLS (essentially the same as Kalman filtering),
- FAP, etc. Some perform significantly better than NLMS. However, factors such
- as computational complexity and patents favour the use of NLMS.
- A simple refinement to NLMS can improve its performance with speech. NLMS tends
- to adapt best to the strongest parts of a signal. If the signal is white noise,
- the NLMS algorithm works very well. However, speech has more low frequency than
- high frequency content. Pre-whitening (i.e. filtering the signal to flatten its
- spectrum) the echo signal improves the adapt rate for speech, and ensures the
- final residual signal is not heavily biased towards high frequencies. A very
- low complexity filter is adequate for this, so pre-whitening adds little to the
- compute requirements of the echo canceller.
- An FIR filter adapted using pre-whitened NLMS performs well, provided certain
- conditions are met:
- - The transmitted signal has poor self-correlation.
- - There is no signal being generated within the environment being
- cancelled.
- The difficulty is that neither of these can be guaranteed.
- If the adaption is performed while transmitting noise (or something fairly
- noise like, such as voice) the adaption works very well. If the adaption is
- performed while transmitting something highly correlative (typically narrow
- band energy such as signalling tones or DTMF), the adaption can go seriously
- wrong. The reason is there is only one solution for the adaption on a near
- random signal - the impulse response of the line. For a repetitive signal,
- there are any number of solutions which converge the adaption, and nothing
- guides the adaption to choose the generalised one. Allowing an untrained
- canceller to converge on this kind of narrowband energy probably a good thing,
- since at least it cancels the tones. Allowing a well converged canceller to
- continue converging on such energy is just a way to ruin its generalised
- adaption. A narrowband detector is needed, so adapation can be suspended at
- appropriate times.
- The adaption process is based on trying to eliminate the received signal. When
- there is any signal from within the environment being cancelled it may upset
- the adaption process. Similarly, if the signal we are transmitting is small,
- noise may dominate and disturb the adaption process. If we can ensure that the
- adaption is only performed when we are transmitting a significant signal level,
- and the environment is not, things will be OK. Clearly, it is easy to tell when
- we are sending a significant signal. Telling, if the environment is generating
- a significant signal, and doing it with sufficient speed that the adaption will
- not have diverged too much more we stop it, is a little harder.
- The key problem in detecting when the environment is sourcing significant
- energy is that we must do this very quickly. Given a reasonably long sample of
- the received signal, there are a number of strategies which may be used to
- assess whether that signal contains a strong far end component. However, by the
- time that assessment is complete the far end signal will have already caused
- major mis-convergence in the adaption process. An assessment algorithm is
- needed which produces a fairly accurate result from a very short burst of far
- end energy.
- How do I use it?
- The echo cancellor processes both the transmit and receive streams sample by
- sample. The processing function is not declared inline. Unfortunately,
- cancellation requires many operations per sample, so the call overhead is only
- a minor burden.
- */
- #include "fir.h"
- #include "oslec.h"
- /*
- G.168 echo canceller descriptor. This defines the working state for a line
- echo canceller.
- */
- struct oslec_state {
- int16_t tx;
- int16_t rx;
- int16_t clean;
- int16_t clean_nlp;
- int nonupdate_dwell;
- int curr_pos;
- int taps;
- int log2taps;
- int adaption_mode;
- int cond_met;
- int32_t pstates;
- int16_t adapt;
- int32_t factor;
- int16_t shift;
- /* Average levels and averaging filter states */
- int ltxacc;
- int lrxacc;
- int lcleanacc;
- int lclean_bgacc;
- int ltx;
- int lrx;
- int lclean;
- int lclean_bg;
- int lbgn;
- int lbgn_acc;
- int lbgn_upper;
- int lbgn_upper_acc;
- /* foreground and background filter states */
- struct fir16_state_t fir_state;
- struct fir16_state_t fir_state_bg;
- int16_t *fir_taps16[2];
- /* DC blocking filter states */
- int tx_1;
- int tx_2;
- int rx_1;
- int rx_2;
- /* optional High Pass Filter states */
- int32_t xvtx[5];
- int32_t yvtx[5];
- int32_t xvrx[5];
- int32_t yvrx[5];
- /* Parameters for the optional Hoth noise generator */
- int cng_level;
- int cng_rndnum;
- int cng_filter;
- /* snapshot sample of coeffs used for development */
- int16_t *snapshot;
- };
- #endif /* __ECHO_H */
|