I looked at some examples in the spec draft and I noticed that some properties whose values are/should be URLs have things like:
I'd like to suggest that in the examples in the spec we use some made-up example hostnames much like in the ActivityPub spec, except that we'd choose names related to forges. For example, in the Vervis federation docs, I use names like:
@zPlus, @bill-auger, @vaeringjar, what do you think? :)
A related question is about names. The AP spec has some creative non-normative descriptions, and those descriptions include using person names that aren't just Alice and Bob. I'm doing the same in Vervis (honestly, because I just enjoy putting in some creativity, it's harder for me to follow strict Alice-and-Bob formality), and I'd love to do this here in the ForgeFed spec. How do you feel about that?
(If you're unsure, that's fine, I can make one such example and then you can see how you feel about it)
(Btw the Vervis federation document is here)