The code states it's using the MIT license.
The asd file stats BSD.
Which is correct?
As an aside thanks for being so responsive!
The original repository:
Contains a single file with a license which is the MIT style:
and in the README is stated that the code is MIT licensed.
So i believe the program is MIT licensed and the asdf file is wrong.
But before i change that line i prefer to get in touch with the original author.
Anyway, thank you for your kind words! Given the small number of people using CL sometimes i feel like i was forced to use the "single programming" style; :-) so i am happy to have someone with i can discuss and collaborate about lisp code!
I write lisp code everyday in uite a decent size team!
I'm trying to open source some lisp code from Google, please take a look:
Quite a bit more is coming, just takes a while...
This is really interesting, it is a lot of code, congratulation!! I hope using such a language at google could help removing the diffuse feeling that lisp (especially common lisp) is an old language not useful for real task.